Goddamn Women Drivers
The Reverend Bishop has just finished taking a driving quiz at MSN.com.
Disclosure: The Reverend Bishop did not get a perfect score; the Reverend got 90% of the questions correct and does not know or care which ones he missed.
The Reverend scored almost 10 points above the average. Most states, according to the test, require a score of 80 or higher to get a license. With that in mind, here are some interesting points:
- The average male participant scored an 83
- The average female participant scored a 78
- Car insurance for men is more expensive, based on sound research
- Women are traditionally stereotyped as poorer drivers
What does this say to the Reverend Bishop’s congregation?
Well, first of all, women can’t drive. But you already knew that.
It’s a damn shame that the contemporary backlash against sexism, a very real problem in the United States and elsewhere in the world, has come so close to banishing very real and valuable differences between the sexes from all polite discourse.
I don’t know why women don’t know the rules of the road, but according to this (less-than-scientific) survey, they don’t. Given the self-selection criteria in this case, I would imagine that women taking this test scored higher than the average woman; they were technically savvy and interested enough to get to MSN.com and take the test, after all.
I can’t prove any of that, of course.
What I can prove is that men’s car insurance premiums are higher than women’s, and that this practice is actually based on sound research. Men know what they’re supposed to be doing, but they aren’t necessarily doing it. There could be any number of reasons for this, of course.
The Reverend submits to you a difference in something beyond temperament; aggressiveness and simple “showing off” do not account for all the differences between men and women in the driver’s seat.
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9B05E3D61238F933A15756C0A964948260
Boys who have a severe deficiency of male hormones in the years of puberty grow up to have less ability in spatial reasoning than others who had normal hormone levels, according to a study in Thursday’s issue of The New England Journal of Medicine.
How is it possible that a person who has inferior spatial reasoning ability could be a better driver than someone who doesn’t?
Well, let’s face it: I’m pretty certain I know where the front bumper of the ‘Stang is, so I don’t worry about whether or not I’m going to hit something when I’m parking/backing up/turning at an intersection/whatever, right? Of course, everyone makes mistakes sometimes. So is it possible that the less confident individual (who tries harder to avoid things because he or she isn’t necessarily certain that they aren’t, in fact, in the way) may be less apt to suffer the consequences of a mistake made when driving close to another object?
I wonder how much difference that makes.
Anyway, the Reverend Bishop has spoken! I don’t want to hear any more shit when I talk about “damn women drivers.”
Recent Comments Gravatars